| The
Groundwater Resources Association will be hosting the third symposium
in The Series on Groundwater Contaminants: Arsenic. Cooperating organizations
include the International Association of Hydrogeologists (IAH),
Water Education Foundation (WEF), California Groundwater
Association (CGA), National Ground Water Association (NGWA),
American Ground Water Trust (AGWT), The Professional Environmental
Marketing Association (PEMA), Association of California Water
Agencies (ACWA), and The Natural Resources Section of the California
State Bar. The Symposium will be held at the Radisson Hotel in
Sacramento California on October 3, 2001.
Arsenic
is Ubiquitous.
Arsenic,
with the exception of hazardous waste hot spots, occurs naturally
in the environment. The distribution of arsenic in soil, groundwater
and surface water has been extensively investigated during the
past two decades. The USGS has collected and analyzed arsenic
in potable water from over 18,000 wells in nearly 600 counties
across the US. While arsenic is ubiquitous and generally detectable
at some concentration, the issue of focus is to what extent are
detections of arsenic significant with regard to protecting water
supplies and public health.
Regulatory
Process Stymied.
For centuries,
arsenic has been recognized as a toxic element. In 1999, the National
Research Council (NRC) reported on historical toxicological studies
relating to arsenic and its contribution to a variety of cancers.
Further, the NRC recommended that the present maximum contaminant
level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water of 50 ug/l be lowered.
After decades of scientific study, followed by the USEPA regulatory
process of public review and comment, the USEPA in January 2001
recommended that the standard be lowered to 10 ug/l. Shortly thereafter,
in March 2001, the process for EPA to reach a final decision on
the rule came to an abrupt halt. With the entrance of the new
political administration, and a new head of the USEPA, the recommendation
to lower the standard was delayed for reasons cited to be a lack
of "clear proof" of the health risk and the need to allow for
independent reviews of the science behind the studies and estimates
of implementation costs.
Arsenic
Symposium
While the
extensive and prolonged process of reevaluating the arsenic MCL
had reached a tentative milestone early this year, the delay has
caused intense focus on the regulatory process of developing or
changing drinking water standards. This Symposium is planned to
bring the scientific community, regulators, water purveyors, industry,
attorneys, and political representatives up-to-date on the current
issues surrounding arsenic in groundwater.
The one-day
conference will be similar to GRA's recent symposium on Hexavalent
Chromium and includes the following sessions:
- Arsenic
Geochemical Characteristics and Distribution
- Risk,
Toxicology and Regulations
- Water
Supplies and Social, Political, Economic and Legal Issues
- Treatment
and Remediation
Program
Agenda
- Wednesday, October 3, 2001
|
|
8:00-8:45
am
-- Registration and Pastries
|
|

|
| 8:45-9:15
am --
Welcome and Overview of the Problem
and Day |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim
Parker, President, GRA
Dr. Lee Shull, Principal/Senior Toxicologist,
Montgomery Watson Harza |
 |
| 9:15-10:00
am
-- Session One: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arsenic
Characteristics, Geochemistry and Distribution |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
Richard Shatz, Bookman-Edmonston
Martin Steinpress, Montgomery Watson Harza
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arsenic
In Groundwater in the United States: Occurrence and Geochemistry
Allan Welch, USGS Water Resources Division,
Reno, NV |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Arsenic Groundwater Contamination
Dr. T.R. Hathaway, DTSC, Cal-EPA |
 |
| 10:15-10:30
am -- Break |
 |
| 10:30-12:00
pm -- Session Two: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk/Toxicology
and Regulations |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
Paul Parmentier, IT Corporation
Dr. Lee Shull, Montgomery Watson Harza |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
on the MCL
Bruce Macler, US EPA Region 9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
Assessment for Arsenic in Drinking Water, Cal-EPA PHG
Dr. Robert A. Howd, Chief, Water Toxicology
Unit, OEHHA, Cal-EPA
|
Implementation
of the Public Health Goals and the Future of Drinking
Water Standards for Arsenic
Dr. David Spath, Drinking Water Division
Chief, CA DHS |
Sampling
and Analysis of Arsenic and Arsenic Speciation
Bart Simmons, DTSC, Cal-EPA |
 |
| 12:00-1:30
pm -- Lunch: Keynote Presentation,
TBA |
 |
| 1:45-3:00
pm -- Session Three: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
& Remediation |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators: Zaid Chowdhury, Malcolm Pirnie
Rula Deeb, Malcolm Pirnie |
Implementing
Arsenic Controls for Groundwater Utilities
Michelle Frey, McGuire Environmental Consultants |
Arsenic
Chemistry and Traditional Water Treatment Processes for
Arsenic Removal
Dr. Steve Reiber, HDR, Inc. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
for Arsenic in the Context of Remediation
Joseph Drago, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants,
Inc.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovations
in Water Treatment Processes for Arsenic Removal
Dr. Sunil Kommineni, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. |
 |
| 3:00-3:15
pm -- Break |
 |
| 3:15-4:45
pm -- Session Four: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social
and Political Impacts, and Legal Issues |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
Thomas Johnson, LFR Levine Fricke
Debbie Reid, KOMEX
|
Panel:
Krista Clark, Association of California
Water Agencies
Joseph Gonzalez, Esq., Masry & Vititoe
James Goodrich, Water Resources Consultant,
Chair, AGWSE Div. of NGWA
John Gregory, Esq., LeBouef, Lamb, Greene
& MacRae LLP
Dr. Janet Hering, California Institute of
Technology
Susan Umshler, Esq., P.E., Law & Resource
Planning Associates |
 |
| 4:45-5:00
pm -- Conclusion |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim
Parker |
 |
| 5:00-6:00
pm -- Reception |
|
|
|
Cooperating
Organizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|